Working Groups

Leadership

Working-group leaders maintain scope, convene contributors, turn discussion into decisions and ensure deliverables move through review.

For
Alliance members and prospective participants
Last reviewed
2026-08-05
Review cycle
Review every 6 months

Why it matters

Good leadership makes participation predictable and prevents work from depending on undocumented context.

In brief

Working-group leaders maintain scope, convene contributors, turn discussion into decisions and ensure deliverables move through review. They also connect dependencies and unresolved issues with other groups and Alliance governance.

If you need a decision, send the lead a short statement of the problem, the affected deliverable, the options already considered and the date by which an answer matters. That gives the group something concrete to schedule, delegate or escalate.

Key considerations

1. Steward

Keep the charter, roadmap, membership expectations and decision record current.

2. Deliver

Assign owners, define milestones, surface blockers and close or redirect work that no longer fits.

3. Connect

Coordinate overlapping architecture, software, system, assurance and communication topics across groups.

Evidence and caveats

Leadership and membership change. Verify the current lead and deputy on the live group page before directing a request.

Use the live charter, project record or published output for current status. Name owners and dates for work in progress.

Primary routes

Where next

Contact the current lead with the relevant project, decision or deliverable rather than a general request to the whole group.

Review the group’s charter