Business & Policy

Total cost of ownership

Total cost of ownership compares all material costs over the decision horizon: acquisition, integration, operation, support, change and retirement.

For
Business leaders, policymakers, regulators and procurement teams
Last reviewed
2026-08-05
Review cycle
Review every 6 months

Why it matters

A lifecycle model is more useful than comparing board or IP prices because security architecture affects teams and products long after purchase.

In brief

Total cost of ownership compares all material costs over the decision horizon: acquisition, integration, operation, support, change and retirement. For CHERI it places upfront platform and porting work beside the possible reduction of some vulnerability, incident and assurance costs.

Key considerations

1. Acquire and integrate

Include hardware or IP, tools, supplier support, engineering, verification, training and certification.

2. Operate and maintain

Model updates, defect response, monitoring, support branches, third-party dependencies and dual-platform periods.

3. Retire and replace

Include migration, data or service continuity, end-of-support risk and the option value of portable software and standards.

Evidence and caveats

Do not count the same avoided cost twice across risk, maintenance and downtime categories. Show present-value assumptions and sensitivity where finance requires them.

Show assumptions, ranges, dates and owners for economic or policy claims. Recheck legislation, guidance, product status and prices at the decision date.

Primary routes

Where next

Build the model by phase and cost owner, use ranges, and compare at least a baseline, pilot and scaled-adoption scenario.

Test the investment case