Business & Policy

Procurement

Procurement can turn secure-by-design intent into demand by asking suppliers for measurable properties, implementation evidence and lifecycle commitments.

For
Business leaders, policymakers, regulators and procurement teams
Last reviewed
2026-08-05
Review cycle
Review every 6 months

Why it matters

Well-formed criteria let suppliers propose suitable architectures while giving buyers evidence they can compare and enforce after contract award.

In brief

Procurement can turn secure-by-design intent into demand by asking suppliers for measurable properties, implementation evidence and lifecycle commitments. CHERI should appear as a means to achieve defined memory-safety and compartmentalisation outcomes, not as a brand-only requirement.

Key considerations

1. Outcome

Define the threats, components and security properties in scope, including required fault detection and containment behaviour.

2. Evidence

Request architecture and ABI details, test results, toolchain and software status, vulnerability handling, support periods and independent assurance where proportionate.

3. Lifecycle

Cover updates, component changes, end-of-support notice, recertification triggers, data access and exit arrangements.

Evidence and caveats

Overly prescriptive requirements can exclude valid alternatives; vague ‘CHERI-ready’ language can be impossible to verify. Use scored, evidence-based criteria.

Show assumptions, ranges, dates and owners for economic or policy claims. Recheck legislation, guidance, product status and prices at the decision date.

Primary routes

Where next

Create a supplier questionnaire and evaluation matrix, then test it in early market engagement before issuing a binding requirement.

Define acceptable assurance evidence