Business & Policy

National resilience

National resilience depends on essential digital systems continuing to operate, degrading safely and recovering under stress.

For
Business leaders, policymakers, regulators and procurement teams
Last reviewed
2026-08-05
Review cycle
Review every 6 months

Why it matters

Resilience benefits appear only when the technology is available in suitable platforms, supported by software and skills, and integrated into sectors with long planning and replacement cycles.

In brief

National resilience depends on essential digital systems continuing to operate, degrading safely and recovering under stress. CHERI can contribute by reducing exploitability of some memory errors and enabling stronger containment within devices and services.

Key considerations

1. Systemic exposure

Identify widely deployed components whose compromise could cascade across organisations or services.

2. Adoption capacity

Develop suppliers, open-source maintenance, evaluation facilities, training and assurance capability alongside hardware.

3. Transition

Use pilots, procurement signals and compatible software paths so resilience improves without creating brittle new dependencies.

Evidence and caveats

No processor feature eliminates systemic risk. Concentration, supply-chain compromise, operational error, identity failures and service dependencies still require separate treatment.

Show assumptions, ranges, dates and owners for economic or policy claims. Recheck legislation, guidance, product status and prices at the decision date.

Primary routes

Where next

Choose a cross-sector dependency, map its memory-safety and containment risks, and identify the policy and ecosystem steps needed for credible adoption.

Apply the resilience lens to critical infrastructure